There is a visible world. There is a world of the invisible. And between them is a painting
Vladimir Davidia (real name Selivanov).
Ukrainian artist, was born in Kyiv in the family of a piano teacher and an aviation engineer.
One of the first initiations into painting was clash with the Germans of the 15th and 16th centuries, such as Albrecht Dürer, Lucas Cranach the Elder and Hans Buldung Grien.
“The first Eve in my life is the Eve of Hans Baldung Grien.
I was eight, I stared at her for hours, and then the irreparable happened. The one, the indivisible split into two worlds — a woman and painting. Expulsion from Paradise".
This was the first fall into painting. Through an eroticized body, like through a rabbit hole, straight into painting.
Even then, the child perceived painting precisely as a sovereign world but not as an image of some stories out there. The content of the plots is not interesting. The halcyon game of forms, the sound of colors, the fusion and collision of tones - that's what was interesting. It was similar to how Kandinsky looked at abstract painting. But all this play of figures cleansed of narratives arose against the background of eroticized bodies — Eve, Adam, the crucified Jesus, the Martyr Catherine and others.
This position has persisted to this day.
Artist Statement: The artist considers painting as a sovereign world that lives in its own interests and according to its own laws. The canvas is the space of sacred play in this world. Vladimir partially understands the sacred like Georges Bataille — it is a space of religious experiences and eroticism. Religious experience is born from the awareness of one's mortality and all the feelings associated with this awareness. An erotic experience is born from the shame of one's own nakedness. From these two sources is born the irrational, useless, superfluous sovereign act that transformed the primitive Cro-Magnon into Homo Sapiens - the first drawing on stone.
This drawing was not useful, it was completely excessive in relation to the needs of the tribe. And this crazy "first" drawing was an act of creating a parallel world - a world of symbols, fantasy, arts, philosophy and psychopathology. A highly organized organism served as the birth organ of art. And art turned out to be the organ of creation of a new being - man. Painting is the organ of birth and at the same time the world in which the artist is born. And every person in his ideal embodiment is an artist.
Painting is not a way to depict something from life. This is life itself and a separate world. The canvas is a field of sovereign play with all viewers and artists of the world. Starting with the first artist - that dirty and disheveled savage who gave birth to the first picture from the primordial chaos. Therefore, each individual canvas is a world canvas. Each stroke is a philosophical act, a performance in relation to some order. Somewhere he is socratically corrected, somewhere - the one who mocks cynically. A brushstroke is the subject of the game, the embodied intention itself.
In his student years, Vladimir studied the painting of Velasquez, Rembrandt and Hals a lot by copying - both pictorial and in the form of an analytical drawing. The painting of Franz Hals for the first time discovered that the brushstroke can have the quality of sovereignty - to be not only a means, but also a goal.
So, in his creative search, Vladimir came to expressionism - both to classical German and to its more modern forms.
He received his higher art education at the Mykhailo Boichuk Kyiv State Academy of Decorative-Applied Arts and Design. He also studied for a long time with the master of constructive drawing Andrian Babyuk, who is a student and heir to the school of the famous Ukrainian artist and teacher Viktor Zaretsky. Vladimir considers studying with Andrian Pavlovich one of the most important milestones in his creative development, along with Nikolai Prokofievich Semenenko, a teacher and founder of the art lyceum "Biliy Ptakh" and his unique technique that develops imagination.
As his pseudonym, the artist took the name of his paternal great-grandfather.
His name was Levan Davidia. He was a stranger - a stranger from the Caucasus mountains in the steppe and settled in the former Cossack stanitsa (settlement). Who he was and where exactly he came from no one knew. It is only known that he served somewhere else from time immemorial and fought on some fronts, but it is not known exactly where. Among the inhabitants of the village, he had authority as a bookish person. He had some book, they say, in ancient Aramaic. No one could read it. Only he read it and spoke prophecies about local lands. They say that everything he said came true, except for one thing - the construction of a bridge across the river. As it turned out later, the bridge project was created in this place. But before the planned construction date, historical changes took place in the world, the Soviet world began to disintegrate and the bridge project was forgotten. After his death, the book disappeared as mysteriously (apparently, it was stolen) as he appeared in the village. All that remained was the image of a stranger who came from distant mountains to the polis, a book full of those subjects that were depicted in an album of German paintings of the 15th century, the magical sound of the ancient Aramaic language, an unfinished bridge and a name.
Now, when the war is going on in Ukraine, Vladimir continues to comprehend expressionism and the principle of performativity in the arts, remembering both Artaud, who prophesied about the emergence of fascism, and Jerzy Grotowski with his liberating practices and rituals, and Meister Eckhart with his idea of the kingdom of thought , and about Mikhail Bulgakov with his Master, Margarita and the eternal tragedy of the meeting of the creator with the ruler, love with power, and about Mikhail Vrubel, who freely unfolded the composition from anywhere, and about Sergei Parajanov, who came from the Caucasus mountains, the Ukrainian Dionysus, whose creative rampage one of the most terrible totalitarian systems could not break, and about all the expressionist brothers who were crucified on the pillory of the witty exhibition "Degenerate Art" in 1937.
Personal exhibitions
2023 "Back to the Dance", RA Gallery, Kyiv
2021 "Pieta, Margo and Marginalias"
2021 “Theater of Doors”, painting, 88Hall gallery, Kyiv
2021 "Fugue of Marena", painting, Theater "Suzir'ya", organizers gallery "Hudgraf", H.L.A.M., Kyiv
2019 “Out of Chaos”, painting, Plato’s Cave, Kyiv
2017 "The Story of One Eye", painting, Freud House Art Club, Kyiv
2016 "Ink flowed", painting, Freud House Art Club, Kyiv
2015 "The cat wags its tail", painting, graphics, Art space "Flow”, Kyiv
After Bucha
Tripthych, Oil on canvas, 2000x4500 mm, 2022
Is it barbaric to paint after Bucha massacre?
Adorno's statement about poetry after Auschwitz again gained burning relevance. For me, painting is a form of poetry. And now, when there is a war going on in Ukraine, I put this question to myself.
Fascism returned to the body of the world, manifesting itself in a new, ugly form - rashism. But when I say "returned" to the body of the world, do I mean that he left this body? Was the sick world just in remission? Or maybe fascism, at its core, is something inherent to the social organism of mankind, like viruses and parasites? Maybe it only unfolds historically in one or another form?
As a painter, I ask myself the question — is there a hidden connection between the deep roots of fascism and painting?
Being an expressionist, I am close to this issue. It is not for nothing that the first expressionists were so close to the all-powerful leader of the cult of racial purity - the Führer. They felt his stinking breath all over their bodies, "crucified" at the exhibition "Degenerative Art" on July 19, 1937.
Yes, not only expressionists, but also other modernists were nailed to this "cross". However, I think it was the Expressionists who roused the Führer's greatest fury (is it a coincidence that his unfulfillment as an artist seems to have been rooted precisely in the remoteness of free expression in his compulsively pale, painstakingly executed works?) and his tribe.
And why like that? There are two reasons. The first is obvious. Each stroke of an expressionist is an act of pure expression, and, therefore, an act of defiance, absolute self-will. The expressionist brushstroke refuses to serve the public canon. For a fascist, this is an unheard-of insult. In this sense, expressionism is an anti-fascist practice.
The second reason is less obvious. Expressionism and fascism are born, among other things, from a yearning for a common origin.
An expressionist is an impressionist looking into the abyss. Now he is wounded by this abyss and by Kierkegaard's despair. Now he can't just reveal impressions like an impressionist, because he saw the lies of this world and the chaos behind the masks and the scenes. But the cracked shell of the world not only exposed the lies and falseness of this world. Through these cracks also sounded the sounds of primordial chaos, which alone can make us alive. The expressionist reconnects with the primitive pioneer artist, poet and dancer. And the expressionist does not cast aside his own shame, looking at the flaws and cracks in his reflection. He goes through this shame, intuitively feeling that true beauty is shameful. She is on the border of taboo, which is separated by shame. The expressionist does not follow the idea, but the spontaneous excitement that arises at this border. Expressionism is eroticism.
But the source of eroticism is shame in front of one's own nakedness. This is the gap, the crack through which the expressionist passes, coming out to beauty and pleasure.
The fascist is blind and mediocre. He hears a ringing, but does not know where he is. Seeing the cracks in the shell of the world, he starts a war with this deceitful, false, vile and dishonorable world. Struggling with lies and injustice, he creates lies and injustice so grandiose that no mind can comprehend it.
Fear of chaos compels him to build an order that is as terrifying as it is caricatured.
Looking at this world, he cannot see his own cracked reflection. His rage at the mirror is as great as his shame. He cannot bear his own nakedness. But he loves it when another stands naked in front of him.
And when he hears the call of the primordial chaos, the sounds of the ancient gods, he calls not the original artist, but the primitive leader.
This is one of the forms of the eternal dialectic of the artist and the ruler.
Paradoxically, both expressionism and fascism are two responses to the same challenge.
This is the challenge of life rushing outwards, not being embodied in an increasingly rational modern society. In fact, this is a challenge to self-embodiment, and, therefore, self-expression. And in true self-expression - the truth, inaccessible through rational modern practices.
The deeper and more skillfully we unfold this self-expression, the closer we will be to our truths and the more reliably our souls will be protected from the plague of fascism. Unrealized self-expression will inevitably lead to some form of fascism. But self-expression requires practices, organs of self-expression. Art is one such body. And in this sense, the history of expressionism (in different types of arts, and maybe in the sciences) is just beginning.
Returning to the question, will painting be barbaric after Bucha massacre? In a way, yes. But in the sense that a barbarian (lat. Barbars - a stranger) is a stranger, a foreigner who speaks a different language. He is strange, incomprehensible, does unusual things. And this is exactly what fascism hates the most - alien, different, strange, unusual. Not just hate, that's the essence of it.
Expressionism is often misunderstood as an expression of what is. Not quite so, expressionism is an expression of what is not. That which is already knocking from non-existence, but has not yet been born, not yet formalized. Expressionism is the birth of the other. And support for the birth of another is the only cure for deep fascism. Everything else is a way to contain it.
In conclusion, I will quote a man who saw fascism in its very infancy and who desperately tried to save this world with his theater.
Samurai. I want...
Master. What? Love?
Samurai (gives a mentor a slap in the face). Not at all, unusual things.
Antonin Artaud
Contacts
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vlad.davidia
Instagram: www.instagram.com/davidia.art/
Телеграм: vladdavidia
e-mail: vladimirdavidia@gmail.com
Artworks
http://wikiart.org/en/vladimir-davidia